Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- basics:energy_and_ecology:primary_energy_renewable_per [2024/04/19 11:58] – [Passive House Classes] jgrovesmith
+++ basics:energy_and_ecology:primary_energy_renewable_per [2024/04/26 00:10] (current) – [Energy use and energy generation] jgrovesmith
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 The above-mentioned assessment methods suggest this, but obviously, this is not the case. Renewable energy must be generated, delivered, and often stored. Renewable energy needs infrastructure and space which will become a decisive limiting factor. We want affordable renewable energy for all, and for all applications. For these reasons, energy use must be efficient: energy efficiency is the prerequisite for effective renewable energy supply. Bearing  in mind that a third of the total energy consumed in developed countries is required for operating buildings, we realise how important this sector is for the transition, and obviously the traditional assessment methods are not adequate for this future scenario.
-[{{:picopen:per_landing_fig_1.png?800 |**Fig 1: Primary Energy Rating: From PE to PER**}}]
+[{{:picopen:per_landing_fig_1.png?600 |**Fig 1: Primary Energy Rating: From PE to PER**}}]
 ====Sustainable buildings for a sustainable future====
@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 Therefore, the specific PER values for demand and generation cannot be balanced directly and remain as two distinct dimensions of the assessment.
-[{{:picopen:per_landing_fig_5.png?800 |**Fig. 5: In both situation on the left and the right, the same useful (heated or cooled) space is provided. They differ in the in the space for the energy production, but in the same relation in the building footprint, so the specific PER generation will be similar. Assuming they have the same energy demands, their PER assessments will be the same.**}}]
+[{{:picopen:per_landing_fig_5.png?600 |**Fig. 5: In both situation on the left and the right, the same useful (heated or cooled) space is provided. They differ in the in the space for the energy production, but in the same relation in the building footprint, so the specific PER generation will be similar. Assuming they have the same energy demands, their PER assessments will be the same.**}}]
@@ Line 125: / Line 125: @@
 Grove-Smith, Jessica; Wolfgang Feist; Benjamin Krick: Balancing energy efficiency and renewable energies: An assessment concept for nearly zero-energy buildings. In: Bertoldi, P. JRC of European Commission (ed.): 9th International Conference Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings and Smart Communities, 2016. p. 894-902. [[https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/9th-international-conference-improving-energy-efficiency-commercial-buildings-and-smart-communities|Link to external article here]]
+[[https://outphit.eu/media/filer_public/23/f8/23f86d16-7b27-4a26-950c-40e11c045bf8/d68_outphit_adequatenetzeroratingapproach.pdf|Adequate net zero rating approach chosen for case study projects]]. A report written in context of the [[https://outphit.eu/|outPHit]] project.
 [[https://blog.passivehouse-international.org/renewable-energy-future/|iPHA Blog Bronwyn Barry Our all-renewable energy future: Passive House Plus & Premium]]