certification:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
certification:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium [2024/04/18 21:50] – [Generation and demand remain separated] jgrovesmith | certification:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium [2024/04/18 22:11] (current) – jgrovesmith | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
- | Anyone who has built or lives in a Passive House building already has this part of the energy transition taken care of. After all, the low energy demand in a Passive House can sustainably come from regional energy sources. The supply structure is transitioning from fossil sources to renewables at an encouragingly rapid pace. The conventional primary energy assessment systems for energy demand in buildings are based on old supply systems and do not work in the new one with an increasing share of renewables. The Passive House Institute therefore developed a new evaluation system based on renewable primary energy ([[basics: | + | Anyone who has built or lives in a Passive House building already has this part of the energy transition taken care of. After all, the low energy demand in a Passive House can sustainably come from regional energy sources. The supply structure is transitioning from fossil sources to renewables at an encouragingly rapid pace. The conventional primary energy assessment systems for energy demand in buildings are based on old supply systems and do not work in the new one with an increasing share of renewables. The Passive House Institute therefore developed a unique |
* The **Passive House Classic**, which is the traditional Passive House | * The **Passive House Classic**, which is the traditional Passive House | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* In a **Passive House Premium**, typically far more energy is produced than needed. It is therefore a goal for the particularly ambitious: building owners and designers who want to go beyond what economic and ecological considerations already propose. The Passive House Institute is working to make the Passive House Standard more attractive for this avant-garde. | * In a **Passive House Premium**, typically far more energy is produced than needed. It is therefore a goal for the particularly ambitious: building owners and designers who want to go beyond what economic and ecological considerations already propose. The Passive House Institute is working to make the Passive House Standard more attractive for this avant-garde. | ||
- | This paper illustrates these classes based on specific reference projects and shows how you can take your project to the next level. | + | This paper illustrates these classes based on specific reference projects and shows how you can take your project to the next level. The first section provides a general overview of the PER approach. Which is then followed by example projects to shed light on how to achieve the different Passive House classes. Some general PER concepts are explained in context of the specific example projects. |
- | ===== Passive House Classes | + | \\ |
+ | ===== PER and Passive House Classes ===== | ||
Most people probably think of a single number when they hear the term Passive House: 15 kWh/ | Most people probably think of a single number when they hear the term Passive House: 15 kWh/ | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
But heating energy demand does not tell the whole story; after all, heating energy demand is roughly equal to hot water demand in a Passive House. Demand for household electricity is usually much higher. A building’s total energy demand – including the energy needed to provide the building with final energy – therefore also needs to be taken into account. This is where the Passive House classes come into play. They divide buildings into classes or categories based on their total renewable primary energy demand and their renewable primary power production (Figure 1). | But heating energy demand does not tell the whole story; after all, heating energy demand is roughly equal to hot water demand in a Passive House. Demand for household electricity is usually much higher. A building’s total energy demand – including the energy needed to provide the building with final energy – therefore also needs to be taken into account. This is where the Passive House classes come into play. They divide buildings into classes or categories based on their total renewable primary energy demand and their renewable primary power production (Figure 1). | ||
- | [{{: | + | [{{: |
==== Generation and demand remain separated ==== | ==== Generation and demand remain separated ==== | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
==== Energy generation relative to the building’s ground area ==== | ==== Energy generation relative to the building’s ground area ==== | ||
- | Often, energy demand and generation are stated with reference to a building’s treated floor area. If a building has a photovoltaic array, it can produce a certain amount of energy, but the amount per square meter of floor area decreases as the number of stories (and hence floor area) increases. Single-story bungalows thus seem to perform better than row houses and duplexes/ | + | Often, energy demand and generation are both stated with reference to a building’s treated floor area. If a building has a photovoltaic array, it can produce a certain amount of energy, but the amount per square meter of floor area decreases as the number of stories (and hence floor area) increases. Single-story bungalows thus seem to perform better than row houses and duplexes/ |
- | Stating renewable energy production in terms of floor area can thus also lead to improper optimizations. In the new concept, energy generation is instead stated relative to the building’s | + | Stating renewable energy production in terms of floor area can thus also lead to improper optimizations. In the PER concept |
==== Using biomass budgets efficiently ==== | ==== Using biomass budgets efficiently ==== | ||
- | Both within Germany and worldwide, biomass is only available in limited amounts. There is a clear usage hierarchy for biomass: 1) food production, 2) materials, and 3) energy [Krick 2012]. Because biomass can be stored and has a high energy density, it will mainly be needed in mobile applications (transport). Only a small amount will be left over for consumption in buildings. The new PHPP 9 sets the amount of renewable primary energy left over at 20 kWh/ | + | Both within Germany and worldwide, biomass is only available in limited amounts. There is a clear usage hierarchy for biomass: 1) food production, 2) materials, and 3) energy [Krick 2012]. Because biomass can be stored and has a high energy density, it will mainly be needed in mobile applications (transport). Only a small amount will be left over for consumption in buildings. The PER methodology limits |
For instance, if a building has a condensation boiler (PER of renewable gas: 1.75), the first 20 kWh/ | For instance, if a building has a condensation boiler (PER of renewable gas: 1.75), the first 20 kWh/ | ||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
Note that it is more efficient to generate electricity with biomass first and then use a heat pump for heat supply second. If some of the biomass is combusted in a household stove, around 80 percent of the primary energy can be converted into useful heat. If biomass is consumed in a cogeneration unit, around 50 percent of the energy is used to produce electricity and 30 percent to produce useful heat, with only 20 percent losses. A heat pump allows three units of heat to be generated from a single unit of electricity. In this case, 50 percent electricity becomes 150 percent heat in addition to the 30 percent useful heat from the cogeneration unit. As a result, biomass produces 180 percent useful heat in combination with a heat pump instead of 80 percent useful heat from direct combustion. Nonetheless, | Note that it is more efficient to generate electricity with biomass first and then use a heat pump for heat supply second. If some of the biomass is combusted in a household stove, around 80 percent of the primary energy can be converted into useful heat. If biomass is consumed in a cogeneration unit, around 50 percent of the energy is used to produce electricity and 30 percent to produce useful heat, with only 20 percent losses. A heat pump allows three units of heat to be generated from a single unit of electricity. In this case, 50 percent electricity becomes 150 percent heat in addition to the 30 percent useful heat from the cogeneration unit. As a result, biomass produces 180 percent useful heat in combination with a heat pump instead of 80 percent useful heat from direct combustion. Nonetheless, | ||
- | ===== What do the new Passive House classes look like in detail? ===== | + | \\ |
- | + | ||
- | This section uses reference projects to shed light on the new classes. General questions are answered with reference to the specific reference cases. | + | |
===== Single-family Passive House home in Gerstetten, architect: Werner Friedl ===== | ===== Single-family Passive House home in Gerstetten, architect: Werner Friedl ===== | ||
Line 67: | Line 66: | ||
We still have a gap to close before reaching Passive House Premium. Simply optimizing building services will not get us there; we have to make changes to the building envelope. Instead of the original window frames of efficiency class phB, Passive House windows of class phA can be used to reduce annual demand for heating energy down to only 8 kWh/ | We still have a gap to close before reaching Passive House Premium. Simply optimizing building services will not get us there; we have to make changes to the building envelope. Instead of the original window frames of efficiency class phB, Passive House windows of class phA can be used to reduce annual demand for heating energy down to only 8 kWh/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
===== Traunstein day care center, architects: Architekturwerkstatt Valentin ===== | ===== Traunstein day care center, architects: Architekturwerkstatt Valentin ===== | ||
Line 85: | Line 86: | ||
To generate the 120 kWh/ | To generate the 120 kWh/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
===== Office complex for the Erdinger Moos wastewater association, | ===== Office complex for the Erdinger Moos wastewater association, | ||
Line 98: | Line 101: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | ==== References ==== | + | ===== References |
[Feist 2014] Feist, Wolfgang: [[basics: | [Feist 2014] Feist, Wolfgang: [[basics: | ||
[Krick 2012] Krick, | [Krick 2012] Krick, | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Krick 2015] Krick, | ||
[Ochs 2013] Ochs, Dermentzis, Feist: Energetic and Economic Optimization of the Renewable Energy Yield of Multi-Storey PHs. In Feist, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Tagungsband zur 17. Internationalen Passivhaustagung 2013 in Frankfurt/ | [Ochs 2013] Ochs, Dermentzis, Feist: Energetic and Economic Optimization of the Renewable Energy Yield of Multi-Storey PHs. In Feist, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Tagungsband zur 17. Internationalen Passivhaustagung 2013 in Frankfurt/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== See also ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[basics: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[certification: | ||
certification/passive_house_categories/classic-plus-premium.1713469805.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/18 21:50 by jgrovesmith