Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- certification:passive_house_categories [2024/04/18 21:21] – jgrovesmith
+++ certification:passive_house_categories [2024/04/19 10:55] (current) – [The Passive House Classes: Classic, Plus and Premium] jgrovesmith
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Renewable energy is the ideal complement to the efficiency of the Passive House Standard. In order to provide guidance for this combination, the Passive House Institute offers three tiers for its building certification: **Classic, Plus and Premium**. They classify the building in terms of their overall efficiency level and the renewable energy generation. The classes Plus and Premium were first introduced with PHPP version 9 (2015) as addition to the well-established Passive House Classic.
-The functional definition of the Passive House and EnerPHit standards remain unchanged and is the same for all three classes (relating to useful energy demand for heating and cooling, as well as airtightness and comfort criteria). The assessment of the different classes is driven by the //total// primary energy demand, as well as renewable energy supply (on-site or nearby). The higher the achieved level of overall efficiency and of renewable energy generation, the higher the Passive House class.
+The functional definition of the Passive House and EnerPHit standards remain unchanged and is the same for all three classes (relating to useful energy demand for heating and cooling, as well as airtightness and comfort criteria). The assessment of the different classes is driven by the //total// primary energy demand, as well as renewable energy supply. The higher the achieved level of overall efficiency and of renewable energy generation, the higher the Passive House class. The Passive House classes are assessed using the PER methodology, [[basics:energy_and_ecology:primary_energy_renewable_per|Primary Energy Renewable]].
-[{{:picopen:20150311_passivehouseclasses_press_release_phi.jpg?500|PER limits for the three Passive House Classes. Plus and Premium classes call for increased overall efficiency (figures on the right) and also require a certain amount of renewable energy generation (figures on the left).}}]
+The classification is available for newbuild Passive House buildings, as well as for **EnerPHit retrofits**. In the case of EnerPHit the PER targets are adjusted slightly to account for the higher heating energy demand limits
-The Passive House Classes are assessed using the PER methodology (Primary Energy Renewable, see details below). In the case of the **Passive House Classic** category, the renewable primary energy demand must not exceed 60 kWh/(m²a). A building built to **Passive House Plus** is more efficient as it may not consume more than 45 kWh/(m²a) of renewable primary energy. It must also generate at least 60 kWh/(m²a) of energy in relation to the area covered by the building. In the case of **Passive House Premium**, the energy demand is limited to just 30 kWh/(m²a), with at least 120 kWh/(m²a) of renewable energy being generated.
+There are different ways of achieving a higher Passive House class. This article shows [[certification:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium|details and examples]] of how to reach the different Passive House Classes, including explanations of how different energy supply systems are considered in the PER methodology (biomass, solar thermal etc.).
-The classification is available for newbuild Passive House buildings, as well as for **EnerPHit retrofits**. In the case of EnerPHit the PER targets are adjusted slightly to account for the higher heating energy demand limits.
+[{{:picopen:20150311_passivehouseclasses_press_release_phi.jpg?500|**PER limits for the three Passive House Classes. Plus and Premium classes call for increased overall efficiency (figures on the right) and also require a certain amount of renewable energy generation (figures on the left).**}}]
-There are different ways of achieving a higher Passive House class. This article shows [[certification:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium|examples]] of how to reach the different Passive House Classes.
-Selected **case studies**:
+\\ Selected **case studies**:
-  * [[webinars:the_world_s_biggest_ph_premium-erne_campus|Passive House Premium – Erne Campus, Ireland]] (iPHA Project Spotlight, Sept 2023)
+  * [[webinars:the_world_s_biggest_ph_premium-erne_campus|Passive House Premium – Erne Campus, Ireland]] (iPHA Project Spotlight, Sept 2023) {{:picopen:members_only.png?25}}
-  * [[webinars:enerphit_plus_retrofit_of_two_high-rise_office_buildings_in_vienna|EnerPHit Plus – High rise office buildings in Vienna, Austria]] (iPHA Project Spotlight, March 2022)
+  * [[webinars:enerphit_plus_retrofit_of_two_high-rise_office_buildings_in_vienna|EnerPHit Plus – High rise office buildings in Vienna, Austria]] (iPHA Project Spotlight, March 2022) {{:picopen:members_only.png?25}}
   * Browse implemented projects worldwide in the online [[http://www.passivhausprojekte.de/index.php?lang=en | Passive House Database]]. Use the advanced search to filter for Passive House or EnerPHit by Class Classic/Plus/Premium.
@@ Line 28: / Line 27: @@
   * It is easier to offset the absolute energy demand in the case of a single family home than it is for a multi-storey building. Multi-story buildings, however, have a lower impact in terms of space and material use and are therefore advantageous in terms of sustainable housing developments.
-Instead of off-setting energy demand and energy generation, the Passive House concept rates both aspects independently of one another. The energy demand is measured against the value of the service, which is represented by the useful space of the building, the so-called “Treated floor area (TFA)”. The renewable generation is measured against the area that the building occupies and that is therefore longer available for other uses: the “Projected building footprint (PBF)”. This approach of independent assessment of the efficiency level (with respect to the living area) and the energy generation (with respect to the projected footprint area) encourages optimised solutions for both parameters. Regardless of whether the building is a bungalow or an office tower, it is ensured that the energy input needed for health and comfort is low and the energy output with respect to the locally available renewable resources is high. Bungalows will automatically become “plus-energy” houses in many cases, whilst high-rises will not be misguidingly downgraded for not achieving “net-zero”.
+Instead of off-setting energy demand and energy generation, the Passive House concept rates both aspects independently of one another. The energy demand is measured against the value of the service, which is represented by the useful space of the building, the so-called “Treated floor area (TFA)”. The renewable generation is measured against the area that the building occupies and that is therefore longer available for other uses: the “Projected building footprint (PBF)”. This approach of independent assessment of the efficiency level (with respect to the living area) and the energy generation (with respect to the projected footprint area) encourages optimised solutions for both parameters. Regardless of whether the building is a bungalow or an office tower, it is ensured that the energy input needed for health and comfort is low and the energy output with respect to the locally available renewable resources is high. Bungalows will automatically become “plus-energy” houses in many cases, whilst high-rises will not be penalised for not achieving “net-zero”.
-[{{:picopen:per_landing_fig_5.png?nolink&943x212 |**In both situations shown the total living space is the same, provided by three single family homes (left) or one multifamily building (right). It is much easier for a single family houses to achieve a net-zero energy balance because of the larger roof space, which puts the multifamily building at a disadvantage. In the PER methodology energy generation is assessed based in the individul building's footprinta area. Assuming the buildings have the same efficiency level, the multifamily can achieve the same PH Class rating as a single family house. (c) PHI**}}]\\
+[{{:picopen:per_landing_fig_5.png?nolink&943x212 |**In both situations shown the total living space is the same, provided by three single family homes (left) or one multifamily building (right). It is much easier for a single family houses to achieve a net-zero energy balance because of the larger roof space, which puts the multifamily building at a disadvantage. In the PER methodology energy generation is assessed based in the individul building's footprinta area. Assuming the buildings have the same efficiency level, the multifamily can achieve the same PH Class rating as a single family house. © PHI**}}]
-\\
+[{{:picopen:per_generationpbf_bronwynbarry.jpg?nolink&600|**Using the projected building footprint (PBF) as reference area provides an equitable approach for renewable energy generation. © Bronwny Barry [[https://blog.passivehouse-international.org/renewable-energy-future/|Our all-renewable energy future: Passive House Plus & Premium]]** }}]
-\\
-===== Renewable Primary Energy, PER =====
+----
-The sun and wind provide primary renewable electricity. Some of this electricity can be used directly. However, storage capacities are necessary for transferring surplus energy to time periods with lower energy gains. These supply secondary electricity as required, and this is associated with losses. Depending on the type of energy application, the proportion of primary and secondary electricity varies, as do the losses for providing energy. These specific energy losses of an energy application are described as the respective PER factor. The demand for domestic energy is quite constant throughout the year, which is why the share of direct electricity is high and the PER factor is low. In contrast with this, heating is necessary only in winter. In order to provide enough energy in winter, electricity must in part be produced in summer and stored with very high losses for the winter, which results in a high PER factor.
-To learn about the PER methodology in detail, please visit the Passipedia landing page [[basics:energy_and_ecology:primary_energy_renewable_per|"Primary Energy Renewable" (PER)]].
-\\
-----
 ====== See also ======
@@ Line 51: / Line 41: @@
 [[http://passivehouse.com/03_certification/02_certification_buildings/01_benefits-of-certification/01_benefits-of-certification.htm|Current building certification criteria]] including the categories Classic, Plus and Premium
-Browse implemented projects worldwide in the online [[http://www.passivhausprojekte.de/index.php?lang=en | Passive House Database]]. Use the advanced search to filter for Passive House or EnerPHit Class Classic/Plus/Premium.
+[[basics:energy_and_ecology:primary_energy_renewable_per|"Primary Energy Renewable" (PER)]] - Passipedia landing page
+[[.:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium|]]
-[[.:passive_house_categories:classic-plus-premium|]] (Lecture given at the 19th International Passive House Conference 2015 by Dr. Benjamin Krick)
 iPHA fact sheet [[phi_publications:2015_vol._4.3_the_new_passive_house_classes_based_on_the_per_system_and_their_implications|No. 3: The new Passive House Classes based on the PER system and their implications]]
-Passipedia landing page [[basics:energy_and_ecology:primary_energy_renewable_per|"Primary Energy Renewable" (PER)]]
+\\ //We welcome any questions or comments regarding the Passive House categories, PER factors or building certification criteria. Please send them to [[info@passivehouse-international.org|info@passivehouse-international.org]].//
-//We welcome any questions or comments regarding the Passive House categories, PER factors or building certification criteria. Please send them to [[info@passivehouse-international.org|info@passivehouse-international.org]].//
 ----