Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- municipalities [2024/07/23 14:42] – [Municipalities lead the way: examples and case studies] yaling.hsiao@passiv.de
+++ municipalities [2024/07/24 16:17] (current) – [Municipalities lead the way: examples and case studies] yaling.hsiao@passiv.de
@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
   * Give grants for a third-party (neutral!) quality assurance.
+\\
+\\
 =====  Municipalities lead the way: examples and case studies =====
@@ Line 55: / Line 56: @@
 |Passive House Legislation & Funding]]
+Some examples are documented in more detail here on Passipedia:
-====  Massachusetts ====
+  * The Commonwealth of **Massachusetts** in the US has a building energy code which allows municipalities within Massachusetts to mandate Passive House for new residential buildings.  Read more about [[policy:Massachusettes|Mandatory Passive House – The Massachusetts Story]].
- In the United States, a lot of energy efficiency work is focused on total building energy use, and the trick to decarbonization is to focus on the thermal performance of a building. The code were actually missing the thermal bridge mitigation, ventilation air, energy recovery, quality envelope. Recently year,  the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has a building energy code which allows municipalities within Massachusetts to mandate Passive House for new residential buildings.  Here read more about [[municipalities:Massachusettes| Masschusetts]]
 \\